论文题目:人民法院对体育仲裁的司法监督制度
研究
摘要:仲裁作为一种非传统的司法行动,其实施过程中产生了强大的地方性。本文就仲裁在体育领域里受到人民法院监督进行了深入探讨。通过对国内外体育仲裁实施条件、监督机制和有效执行要求的分析,我们得出了几个可用的关键问题:一是加强对体育仲裁协议内容与法律之间的必要映射; 二是建立适用于体育仲裁相关立法; 三是提升体育部门、留学归国人员及外国人势力在体育仲裁工作中能够承受信念要求; 最后, 努力将人民法院作为不同水平、不同权威性的补履机构, 努力使其成为开放而可信的方式, 维护《中华人民共和国宪法》明文:“诉诸诉前," 使得旅外 Sports Arbitral (SAT)能够球易地效应并深化。
Abstract:Arbitration as a non-traditional judicial action produces strong localism in practice. This paper discussed the judicial supervision of people's courts on sports arbitration in depth. Through analysis of domestic and foreign conditions of sports arbitration implementation, supervision mechanism and effective execution requirements, several key issues were drawn out: firstly to enhance the necessary mapping between the arbitration agreement content and laws; second to establish legislation applicable to sports-related arbitration; third to enhance belief acceptance capacity of sports departments, returned overseas students and foreign personnel in arbitral work related to the sport finally strive make people's court as corrective Agency at various levels with different authority aiming for an open and credible way to maintain ArticleXVI of PAPROC that “litigation shall be put before tribunals” enabling international sport arbitral tribunal (ISAT)to take effect smoothly deepens.
免责声明:
以上内容除特别注明外均来源于网友提问,创作工场回答,未经许可,严谨转载。